Minutes of the Academic Senate Meeting

of December 3rd, 2002

Chair Robert Cherny called the Academic Senate to order at 2:10 p.m.

Senate Members Present: 

Aaron, Eunice

Avila, Guadalupe

Bartscher, Patricia

Bernstein, Marian

Bernard-Powers, Jane

Blando, John

Blomberg, Judith

Chen, Yu-Charn

Cherny, Robert

Consoli, Andres

Corrigan, Robert A.

Daniels, Robert

Edwards, James

Fielden, Ned

Fung, Robert

Garcia, Oswaldo

Garcia, Velia

Gerson, Deborah

Gill, Sam

Gonzalez, Dan

Gregory, Jan

Houlberg, Rick

Jerris, Scott

Johnson-Brennan, Karen

Kassiola, Joel

Klironomos, Martha

Luft, Sandra

McKeon, Midori

Meredith, David

Morishita, Leroy

Nichols, Amy

Noble, Nancy

Otero, Aina J.

Pong, Wenshen

Raggio, Marcia

Short, Larry

Smith, Brett

Smith, Miriam

Steier, Saul

Stowers, Genie

Strong, Rob

Terrell, Dawn

Turitz, Mitch

Warren, Penelope

Whalen, Maureen

Williams, Robert

Wolfe, Bruce

Yang, Nini

Senate Members Absent:   Newt-Scott, Ronda (abs),  Carrington, Christopher (abs), Collier, James (exc), Colvin, Caran (exc),c)

Guests:  Sheldon Axler, Dan Buttlaire, William Christmas, Suzanne Demetrenko,   Elise Earthman, Ann Hallum, Sung Hu, Alan Jung, ShyShenq Liou, James Newton, Marilyn Verhey, Gail Whitaker

CALL TO ORDER 2:10 p.m.

ANNOUNCEMENTS

Senate Chair Robert Cherny indicated that it is often difficult to see all Senators who are seeking recognition. Cherny asked that Senators hold nameplates up high until they are are visually noted.

Cherny thanked the SFSU Conference center for providing each Senator a holiday treat of a poinsettia plant to take home with them.

Senator Mitch Turitz reminded Senators that the bookstore is holding a special appreciation for faculty and staff 4-6 this afternoon with a 20% discount on most items.

CHAIR’S REPORT

The senate chair did not give a report in order for the senate to have more time for discussion.

AGENDA ITEM #1—APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA FOR December 3, 2002

m/s/p (Houlberg, Terrell) to approve the agenda

AGENDA ITEM #2—APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR November 19, 2002

m/s/p (Houlberg, Terrell) to approve the minutes as corrected

AGENDA ITEM #3—ELECTION OF A MEMBER AT LARGE OF THE SENATE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Rick Houlberg has had to resign from the Executive Committee due to departmental obligations.

Senate Chair Cherny thanked Senator Houlberg for all his work this past semester as a member of the Senates’ Executive Committee. He announced that the senate election committee would now take nominations from the floor. The newly elected Member at Large should be able to attend the Senate Executive Committee meetings held every Tuesday from 12 to 2 PM.

Senator Robert Williams, Department of Counseling, was elected by acclamation

AGENDA ITEM #4–RECOMMENDATION FROM THE ACADEMIC POLICIES COMMITTEE:  CHANGES IN THE UNIVERSITY POLICY ON WRITTEN ENGLISH PROFICIENCY (S93-114), 2nd READING

The Academic Policies Committee recommends the changes in the University Policy on Written English Proficiency (S93-14). The entire policy can by found at #s93-014

Senator Gregory indicated her support for the changes to the policy. The changes will allow students to meet the requirement in a timely fashion.

Voting on the changes to the policy – passed unanimously.

AGENDA ITEM #5—RECOMMENDATION FROM THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE:  UNIVERSITY POLICY ON ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. 2nd reading

Senate Chair Robert Cherny introduced the resolution with the unanimously recommendation of the Senate Executive Committee. He indicated a couple of minor changes since the last senate meeting. The two important changes are in the composition of the committee. First, the committee has been reduced by two members. The new composition will include two student representatives rather than three and three faculty representatives rather than four. This is an attempt to make it easier for the committee to find a convenient meeting time and to hold discussions. Secondly, the two Vice Presidents have been replaced by two members appointed by the Vice President of Academic Affairs.  It is anticipated that these will usually be the Dean of Graduate Studies and the Dean of Undergraduate Studies. Senator Williams ask for clarification on the appointment of the deans to the committee. Senator Chair Cherny indicated that the change was at the request of the Vice President of Academic Affairs.

Voting on the proposed policy - passed unanimously.

AGENDA ITEM #6—RECOMMENDATION FROM THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE:  RESOLUTION AFFIRMING THE ROLE OF FACULTY IN DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS, 2nd reading

Senate Chair Robert Cherny introduced the resolution with the unanimously recommendation of the Senate Executive Committee. The resolution supports the role of faculty in the development and housing of academic programs.

Voting on the proposed resolution - passed unanimously.

 AGENDA ITEM #7—RECOMMENDATION FROM THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE:  RESOLUTION SUPPORTING REDEFINITION OF THE FACULTY WORKLOAD AND CREATING A TASKFORCE TO PLAN IMPLEMENTATION, 2nd reading

Senate Chair Robert Cherny introduced the resolution with the unanimously recommendation of the Senate Executive Committee. The resolution supports redefinition of the faculty workload and creating a taskforce to plan implementation.

Voting on the proposed resolution - passed unanimously.

AGENDA ITEM #8—RECOMMENDATION FROM THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE:  RESOLUTION CALLING FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE TRUSTEES’ PROPOSED BUDGET FOR 2003-04, 2nd reading.

Senate Chair Robert Cherny introduced the resolution with the unanimously recommendation of the Senate Executive Committee. The resolution calls for reconsideration of the trustees’ proposed budget for 2003-04.  The Executive Committee approved a similar resolution on November 12 and faxed it to the Trustees, then meeting in Long Beach that same day; a copy can be found at: budget0203

Voting on the proposed resolution - passed unanimously.

AGENDA ITEM #9—JOINT RECOMMENDATION FROM THE ACADEMIC POLICIES COMMITTEE AND STUDENT AFFAIRS COMMITTEE:  POLICY ON LIMITING ENROLLMENT FOR STUDENTS ON PROBATION, 1st and 2nd reading

Midori McKeon, chair of the Academic Policies Committee, announced that her committee and the Student Affairs Committee met jointly and recommends the attached policy on limiting enrollment for students on probation.

m/s (McKeon, Gerson) to approve

Midori McKeon, chair of the Senate’s Academic Policies Committee presented the following in support of approval of Agenda Item #9.

The Academic Policies Committee and the Student Affairs Committee jointly recommend a policy on limiting the number of units taken by undergraduate students on academic probation.

A draft of the policy was originally brought to the APC and the SAC on March 12, 2002, by Jo Volkert, Assistant Vice President for Enrollment Planning and Management, Registrar Suzanne Dmytrenko, and Helen Goldsmith, Acting Associate Dean of Undergraduate Studies, on behalf of the Registration Advisory Committee, which consists of representatives from all eight colleges.  The Registration Advisory Committee had been presented with the practice of the College of Business to limit Business students on probation to registration in 13 units, a practice that started in Fall 2001.  Representatives of the other colleges on the Registration Advisory Committee expressed interest in extending the unit limitation to all undergraduate students on probation, which prompted the committee’s drafting of the policy.  Because of additional statistical data made available to the APC and the SAC in Fall 2002, which strongly suggested the necessity of the policy, and through careful deliberations at the joint committee meetings this semester, the committees were able to finalize the proposed policy.

If approved, this policy will work in conjunction with the existing Policy on Academic Advising (Academic Senate Policy #S95-191).  The latter policy stipulates advisement for students at “5 pivotal points,” including pivotal point #3, which is described as follows: “if and when the student experiences academic difficulty, including probation and possibility of disqualification.”  Under this current policy on academic advising, students on probation are required to meet with and receive advisement from their program advisor, department chair, and college dean on specific courses to take and the total number of units for the semester.  Statistical data show, however, many students on probation do not honor the advisement received and keep taking more units than approved by their advisors and thus tend to remain on probation.

The new policy will help students in two ways: (1) Students who are struggling academically are not tempted to take heavier course loads than they can handle; (2) Other students who are not in academic difficulty have better access to higher demand courses.

The registration system can be coded to limit students on probation from registering in more than a specified number of units.  Adopting this policy will provide colleges with a way to enforce unit limits that advisors may have been only able to recommend in the past. If students have legitimate reasons and needs for taking more than 13 units, they can do so with the approval of the department chair and the college dean.  Associated Students, Inc. has passed a resolution on November 6, 2002, in support of the policy.

Registrar Suzanne Dmytrenko was available for answering questions from the floor.

Senator Gerson, chair of the Student Affairs Committee, indicated that after extensive committee discussion and with lots of student input the committee consensus is that the new policy will be a service to our students. Senator Williams noted that the policy states 13 and asked if that means enrollment limit is 13 units per semester? Secondly, will the new policy apply to new students or all students? Senator McKeon indicated that the proposed policy limits the enrollment to 13 units per semester and that it would affect both new and current students. Senate Chair Cherny accepted the friendly amendment of Senator Williams to insert the words “semester units” after 13. Senator Wolfe pointed out that advising varies and that just requiring mandatory advising may not improve student’s performance. His concern is that for students who seek advising does that mean advising from their department? Senator McKeon asserted that the role of curricular advising rest with the departments. Senate Chair Cherny reminded senators that we are discussing the policy before the Senate and not the entire policy on university advising. Senator Houlberg indicated his support for the policy. He strongly supported the mandatory advising requirement as it is written in the policy. He had some reservation on the rationale for the policy.

m/s/p (Meredith, Terrell) to second reading

Voting on the policy – passed unanimously.

AGENDA ITEM #10 – PROPOSED ACADEMIC SENATE MEETING SCHEDULE FOR SPRING 2003: 1st and 2nd readings

Senator Dawn Terrell, Member at Large of the Executive Committee moved that the Senate approve the spring meeting schedule. She indicated that the first committee meeting date of January 28th would depend on the need of each committee’s agenda. 

m/s (Terrell, Colvin) to approve the spring semester calendar

Senate Chair Robert Cherny indicated that the individual committee chairs would notify committee members concerning meeting on January 28th.

m/s/p (Houlberg, Johnson Brennan) to second reading

Senator Steier asked if the 28th was the first day of classes for the spring semester?

Cherny indicated that the semester will start on the 27th

AGENDA ITEM #11-- ADJOURNMENT 

m/s/p (Colvin, Terrell) to adjourn

Senate adjourned at   2:41   P.M.

Respectfully Submitted

James Edwards, Secretary to the Faculty