on narrativity

Martin Nakell

 

If I am at a loss for words in the great song,
If it dies out, may it not die out there for me.

- Mwindo Epic
Africa

• •

wholeness, harmony, radiance

James Joyce via St Thomas Aquinas via Stephen Dedalus

• •

Narrativity is not a method to achieve story telling; story telling is a method to accomplish narrativity.

A novel is small
A fiction is large
A narrativity is all encompassing, but open

Art, not story, is the point of it all

The narrative’s language absorbs the phenomenal world it describes. That world, whether real or imagined, no longer exists. Only the world of this language now matters, makes a difference, exists.

The origin [even etymologically] of the narrative is fact; without servitude to verisimilitude, narrativity establishes fact. Once something has successfully become narrative it has successfully become fact.

• •

Narrative is a product of the imagination in an active relationship with the world, is an art performed in language, but which arises before thought, is read by the reader in language but affects the reader past thought, is an art of the whole and wholly incomplete person.

Narrative accomplishes its work through the method of language, not in language but within the language, the language act and the concomitant silence act which takes place in the listener/reader (oral tradition/written tradition). This silence act cannot occur without support: language supports it.

The writer must carefully and with all her/his resources: craft, intelligence, intuition, abandon, emotion, aesthetic, reason and irrationality create a method for the narrative at hand. Only an effective, new, invented narrative will accomplish the act of fiction, the fiction act, a result greater than the sum of its parts, one of which is the reading act.

Narrativity maintains an electrical charge with the phenomenal world. It is the way in which an author tells a story which never gets told.

Narrative = form. Form = purpose. Or beauty. Or meaning, or significance, or presence/absence. ("One loves only form" Charles Olson.) This form can be a premeditated framework or a spontaneous evolution of the writing act. But either way, it must evolve. As in Action Painting, so in Action Writing [and really, what good painting is not some form of Action Painting.]

The work must evoke the enterprise of its process toward form.
Form is macro and micro. The word is form, the letter is form.

• •

Mimesis: Narrative is mimetic. Life unravels. There is no omniscient narrator. Life is not about something, it is something. This is the greatest level of mimesis which narrativity, through its various artifices, achieves. Not imitating life, it is life. Not about something, it is something. The narrativity of the fiction understands that it must charter the narrative of this greater purpose: a mimesis of being and doing.

The more experimental the narrative, the more mimetic it might become. A multivocal point of view is more mimetic than a single or stable point of view. Neologism is more mimetic than the dictionary.

• •

"...the age old struggle between a secret and an utterance."

Roland Barthes

• •

plot

That narrative structure which the novel requires in order to immerse itself into place, for every novel is primarily about place, is place, whether that place is hyperrealistic (Joyce), Surrealistic (Breton), or Anti-Realistic (Robbe-Grillet). [Nonetheless: "All novelists believe they are realists." Robbe-Grillet]

character

Those people in the novel who think, feel, see, hear. They are the novel’s first readers.

In the ancient recitations of the oral tradition, the audience, by its responses, might change the storyteller’s version of the story. Likewise, the characters in a literate novel can act to change the form and/or the content and/or the shape, direction, meaning of the novel.

theme

Because the contemporary culture in which the novel is written insists on a share of the novel (as it insists on a share of the soul of every one of its citizens), it takes the novel’s theme for its own. This does not prohibit universal themes — those themes from all times — for culture itself spans all time.

The theme often thinks of itself as Òwhat the novel is about.Ó This is erroneous in at least two ways:

  1. A novel is not about anything. It is something.
  2. Insofar as we might want to say that the novel is about something, it is always about place.

setting

Every novelist desires to set her/his novel nowhere. They choose a setting which agrees to the least egregious compromise they can make with nowhere. Everywhere would come the closest, while any certain, highly specific here might be the meticulous replacement any novelist might make for everywhere.

The ideology of setting is that nowhere does not exist.

point of view

  1. point of view sustains narrative.
  2. any given point of view lasts only as long as the narrative it sustains.
  3. in Homer the point of view is that of Greece; in Sappho the point of view is that of Sappho; in Gertrude Stein the point of view is that of language; for the eye, the point of view is pure perception.
  4. no point of view is meant to be absolute, reliable, fixed, be it in Homer, Sappho, Stein.
  5. point of view suggests to the reader where they may begin looking for the narrative.
  6. setting, place can always serve as the point of view.

• •

The One and Only Rule of Experimental Literature:

you must attack some of the traditional elements of literature — plot, linear time, traditional realism, character, et alia.

The One & Only Corollary to the One and Only Rule of Experimental Literature:

you cannot destroy any of those elements you challenge. You can so change them by your attack that you transform them, that you make them new; but they themselves are the constants of the energy of narrative.

The Epilogue to the One and Only Rule of Experimental Literature:

you will not annihilate any element of literature which you attack. Yet only if you question and attack those elements will you have a chance to create something living. The process of creating form yields relevance.

to create literary form gives freedom to the narrative; then the narrative itself can breathe, work, create, discover, wander.

despite some formalists’ contention that content is limited to a few possible stories, content changes with each narrative because the author changes with each narrative [especially given the broadest definitions of ‘author’]. Since content and form continuously create each other, the more inventive the form, the newer the content. Every new content requires new form, every new form creates new content.

• •

" ...and every word I write, I say to myself ‘It’s a lie, it’s a lie."

Samuel Beckett.

Beckett understood the enchantment of writing. Not the simple larcenous or rebellious or charming freedom to tell a lie; the freedom of narrative to attempt truth.

• •

Make me laugh. Oh, make me laugh. I want to laugh and laugh and laugh. I want to laugh. Every kind of laughter, make me laugh. I need to laugh. I love to laugh. Narrativity’s goal is to make the dissipated reader laugh.

• •

Literary theory authorizes a lie.

• •


Issue Three
Table of Contents