San Francisco State UniversityA-ZSearchCalendarNeed help?News


 
SF State News
SF State News Home
Headlines
SFSU in the News
Events Calendar
Gator Sports News

Expert commentary
Expert Commentary 1
Expert Commentary 2
Expert Commentary 3

For Journalists
News Releases
Faculty Experts
Backgrounders
Public Affairs Staff

For Faculty
Submit a News Item
Be an Expert Source
Working with the  Media

SFSU Publications
CampusMemo
E-News
SFSU Magazine

Contacts
Public Affairs

Budget update -- April 2004

NOTE: The following e-mail message was sent by President Robert A. Corrigan to SFSU faculty and staff on April 2, 2004

Dear Staff and Faculty Colleagues:

We now have more specific information to offer about long-term budget cuts and strategies across the University. Earlier this week, Vice President Morishita and Provost Gemello presented the latest budget planning news to the University Budget Committee (UBC) and the Academic Senate. In keeping with the openness we have promised to maintain throughout our budget process, I want to share that information with you.

My earlier budget messages have laid the groundwork for the following figures. In just two years -- 2003/04 and 2004/05 -- we will have lost more than $25 million in our general fund budget -- $14.1 million this fiscal year and the $11 million reduction for 2004/05 stemming from the Governor's January budget proposal. If the May revise lowers the CSU's allocation, we will be even harder hit.

We have addressed this year's $14.1 million problem in three ways: using about $4 million in one-time dollars; requiring the vice presidents to make temporary reductions in their areas for a total of $6.6 million; and making $3.5 million in permanent cuts. Looking to 2004/05, we face a need to identify permanent cuts totaling approximately $22 million -- the remainder of the 2003/04 reductions that we addressed on a temporary basis this year plus the projected additional budget reduction of $11 million for 2004/05.

The largest share of the cuts, some $9.8 million, will have to come from Academic Affairs which, as I have noted before, comprises 63% of the University's budget. That $9.8 million figure assumes that Chancellor Reed approves the Academic Instruction fee voted in so resoundingly by our students in the March 2-3 referendum. The fee would bring us $2.9 million. Without it, our cuts would be that much deeper.

The provost, college deans, chairs and faculty are now engaged in an intensive process of conversation and consultation. The plan for proposed cuts in Academic Affairs will be made public no later than the end of April. The provost has already identified several "very likely" elements of that plan: $800,000 in cuts in units reporting to him; a plan to gradually phase out general fund support for remedial courses by fall 2006, for a saving of at least $600,000; a proposed $2.3 million cut in the general fund budget for the College of Business -- achievable in part by moving some programs to self-support; and discontinuation or suspension of other academic programs.

At this point, no decisions to cut academic programs have been made, despite rumors or statements on campus to the contrary. A number of difficult decisions lie ahead; however we have an open and transparent process for reaching them. In addition, we have a number of well-established Senate policies governing program discontinuation, as well as protections for students currently enrolled in such programs. No academic program will be discontinued without a full and open discussion.

In areas other than Academic Affairs, the vice presidents already have identified almost $6 million in new reductions for 2004-05. Key items include more than $2 million in management reductions; elimination of $1.4 million in general fund support to Athletics; a $1 million cut in deferred maintenance; a $573,000 reduction in work study matching funds; the move of the Career Center off the general fund ($530,000); the elimination, for a $402,000 savings, of the Office of Human Relations -- though we remain fully committed both to the values the office represented and to maintaining its essential functions; and reorganization and consolidation of the offices of Public Affairs and Publications, plus other reductions in Advancement, for savings of approximately $800,000.

Up to this point, we have presented the numbers. But all of us who are deeply involved in budget planning know that at an institution where 80% of the budget is salaries and benefits, numbers equal people. That weighs heavily on us, as it should. I can only assure you that we will do our utmost to mitigate the impact on every staff member, every faculty member and every administrator who is ultimately affected by budget cuts.

We will continue to keep you informed as budget planning proceeds.

-- Robert A. Corrigan, president


Robert A. Corrigan President

         

San Francisco State University

Home     Search     Need Help?    

1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132    (415) 338-1111
Last modified July 27, 2004 by University Communications