Bier, M., Kazarian, D. & Peper, E. (2005). Reducing PMS through biofeedback and breathing. Poster presentation at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.

 

 

 

 

 

Reducing the Severity of PMS Symptoms:

A Self Regulation Pilot Study[1]

 

 

Mary Bier, Delainya Kazarian, Erik Peper PhD, Katherine Gibney

San Francisco State University

 

 

 


“Previously my world seemed so out of control during the pre-menstrual time of my cycle.  I finally feel that I have control over my body and my emotions.  I wish I had started this program years ago!”

                                                                  --Participant

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a cyclic, complex, interactive disorder, which includes physical, emotional and behavioral symptoms.  These symptom clusters occur only in the two weeks prior to menstruation and typically taper off several days after the onset of menstruation and do not reappear until at least day 13 of the cycle. The symptom clusters include physical symptoms (abdominal pain or cramps, weight gain, breast tenderness, swelling or bloating, headaches, backaches, acne, appetite changes and tiredness) and psychological symptoms (depression, fatigue, irritability, mood swings, inability to cope with everyday demands, difficulty concentrating, insomnia, uncontrollable sadness or anger) (Rapkin, 2003; Moline et al., 2000; ACOG, 2000).

 

The medical treatment for severe PMS includes selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRI), ovulation suppression (estrogen/progesterone) therapies and anti-anxiety (Prozac) medications.  Concerns about the harmful side effects of long-term medications use, as well as the desire to control one’s own health, drives the interest to develop behavioral interventions to reduce discomfort associated with PMS (Rapkin, 2003; Dickerson et al., 2003). 

 

We hypothesize that a significant component of PMS is psychophysiological dysregulation and enhanced reactivity to internal/external stimuli. Earlier studies by Mathew, et al. (1979) and Konandreas (1990) have shown that PMS symptoms could be ameliorated with peripheral temperature training and relaxation. With the association between PMS and increased emotional arousal and autonomic reactivity (Stroebel, 1982), self-regulation strategies that include relaxation, breathing, quieting response and biofeedback may reduce the discomfort linked with PMS (Peper, 1990).  Therefore, if women could learn to listen to, and respond to, emotionally activating internal and external triggers by relaxing and breathing diaphragmatically, the discomfort of PMS may be reduced

 

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether biofeedback training and self-regulation skills can reduce the severity of PMS symptoms.

 

 

 

 PROCEDURE

 

Subjects:   Nine participants, average age 26, with an average14 year history of PMS volunteered for the study.

Equipment: Pro-Comp+, Biograph 2.1 (Thought Technology, Ltd, Canada).

Respiration: monitored with a strain gauge placed around the waist.

Blood Volume Pulse (BVP):  monitored with a photoplethysmograph placed on the pad of the non-dominant thumb.

Heart Rate: derived from the BVP.

Skin Conductance: recorded with an electrodermograph (EDA) from the pads of the second and fourth distal phalanx on the dominant hand. 

Temperature: recorded with a thermistor placed on the dorsal surface of the                                                                            non-dominant hand.

Pre - Baseline Physiological Profile: sequential trials consisted of sitting eyes open (2 min), eyes closed (2 min), cognitive math serial thirteen stressor (2 min), and sitting eyes open post baseline (2 min).

 

METHOD

 

 

   Fig 1. Flow diagram of procedure

 

TRAINING SESSIONS

 

·         Collection and discussion of home practices and subjective experiences.

·         Individual biofeedback modulated training

·         Feedback and review of physiological data.

·         Practice of diaphragmatic breathing as response to internal and external triggers (adapted from Peper et al, 2000).

·         Handout of daily symptom rating logs and diaphragmatic breathing home practices.  

·         Discussion of training concepts.

 

POST BASELINE

·         Replication of the initial physiological profile.

·         Post training symptom rating assessment.

 


RESULTS

 

·         Severity of emotional and somatic discomfort associated with PMS was significantly reduced for all subjects (p< 0.01) after training and maintained during one month follow-up as shown in figure 2.  In the delayed treatment group symptoms were slightly reduced following self-monitoring and much more reduced following shown in figure 3.   

·         Respiration rate during stressor was significantly reduced in the post-baseline as compared with the pre-baseline conditions for all subjects (p<0.01) (see figure 4). A representative individual pre- and post-baseline recordings are shown in figures 5 and 6.

 

All participants reported in the 4 week post training subjective follow-up:

·         Continued reduced symptoms.

·         Positive outcomes from generalization of skills into daily life in response to stressful stimuli such as menstrual cramping, stress during an exam or when writing papers, arousal during arguments with their partners, and while driving in traffic.

·         A renewed sense of self awareness and self control throughout their entire cycle and a significant reduction in PMS discomfort.

 

 

                     Fig. 2 Change in psychological and physical symptoms following training for all subjects.                    

 

                                                                                                                                                  

Fig. 3. Change in psychological and physical symptoms for experimental subjects (Pre-exp to Post-exp) and delayed treatment controls. Observe the slight decrease in symptoms during self-monitoring for the controls (Pre-controls to Pre1-controls) followed by a larger decrease in symptoms following training (Pre1-controls to Post-controls).

 

 

Fig. 4. Decrease in respiration rate across all conditions following training.

 

 

Fig. 5. Representative pre-baseline physiological recording

 

 

Fig. 6. Representative post-training physiological recording.

 


DISCUSSION

This pilot study suggests that biofeedback training and respiration based relaxation with a strong emphasis on slow diaphragmatic breathing in response to internal and external stimuli and stressor, PMS sensations, reduces the severity of PMS discomfort.   The major difficulties for participants were finding time and remembering to practice as well as loosening their belts to allow diaphragmatic breathing to occur (limiting ‘designer’s jean’ syndrome). Some, especially those who tended to breathe shallowly and rapidly in their chests, would benefit from more training sessions.  Charting symptoms appeared to increase self-awareness and reduce symptoms as shown by the decrease in symptoms of in the delayed treatment group.  As one subject said: “Not just during my pre-menstrual week but overall I am having good days, my relationship with my boyfriend is going really good now.  I love breathing.”

 

An underlying factor associated with success was learning to breathe in response to stressors and develop a non-striving attitude. This developed a “time-out experience,” which stopped the escalating arousal and led to a new sense of openness, a positive outlook and a desire for more training sessions.

With all nine participants gaining personal control over both physiological and psychological symptoms of PMS, replications of the study should be conducted over an extended period of time. This pilot study suggests that women with PMS should use self-regulation strategies to reduce discomfort as the first intervention before using medications.

 

 “Biofeedback and breathing training have allowed me to reconnect with my physiology and regain control over my reactions and emotions during stressful times.  I now feel a sense of empowerment and balance that I have been missing for many years.”

 

 

 REFERENCES

 

ACOG (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists). (2000). Premenstrual syndrome. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 15.

Dickerson, L.M., Mazyck,P.M. & Hunter M.H. (2003). Premenstrual Syndrome. American Family Physician. 67(8):1743-53.

Konandreas,G.K. (1990). The effect of biofeedback and relaxation on premenstrual syndrome. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(1-B).

Luthe, W. & Schultz, J.H. (1969). Autogenic Therapy Volume II: Medical Applications. New York: Grune & Stratton.

Mathew, R.J., Claghorn, J.L., Largen, J.W., & Dobbins, K. (1979). Skin Temperature control for premenstrual tension syndrome: A pilot study. American Journal of Clinical Biofeedback, 2(1), 7-10

Moline, M.L. & Zendell, S.M. (2000). Evaluating and managing premenstrual syndrome. Medscape Womens Health. 5:1-16.

Peper, E. (1990). Breathing For Health. Montreal: Thought Tech­nology Ltd.

Peper, E, Gibney, K. & Holt, C. (2002). Make Health Happen. Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt

Rapkin, A. (2003). A review of treatment of premenstrual syndrome & premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 28, 39-53

Stroebel, C. F. (1982). QR The Quieting Reflex. New York:  G. P. Putnam's Son.

 

 



[1] For communications contact:

Erik Peper, Ph.D.

Institute for Holistic Healing Studies

San Francisco State University

1600 Holloway Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94132

Tel: 415 338 7683

Email: epeper@sfsu.edu