CBLS RESEARCH PROPOSAL FORMAT
DESCRIPTION: This will be
a one to two page overview of your research, written so a non-specialist can
understand the logic of the research goals and methods, and including the
methods to be employed. It should
contain no scientific jargon and no references, and unusual terms and methods
need to be briefly defined. After
reading just this description, the reader should know what you are doing, why
and how. Some of this information will
be repeated in the body of the proposal.
This description can be adapted for use in the SFSU human and animal
research subject approval process.
I. INTRODUCTION
A.
Literature Review: The proposal
must contain background information adequate for the non-expert members of your
committee to fully appreciate your research.
This will include scientific and clinical background, previous work in
the area and unique methodologies.
Subheadings and subsections are extremely useful in the portion. For the proposal, the literature review will
normally be only 5 pages and have no more than 10-20 references (will be
expanded and updated for the final document).
Referencing uses the New England Journal of Medicine style with
two exceptions: all authors must be
included (no et al.) and the citations in the text need not be superscripted.
B.
Rationale: A one paragraph to
one page rationale will include an hypothesis as well as:
1. concise statements of the problem you are
trying to solve;
2. how you will attempt to
solve the problem; and
3. the potential significance of the results,
including clinical relevance.
II.
RESEARCH DESIGN will include:
A.
A narrative of the project in the sequence in which the research
segments or experiments will be performed;
B.
A justification for each method or approach and for the number of
samples or replicate data and the controls to be used;
C. A flow chart.
III. DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION will
include how you will present your results (e.g., cpm or stimulation index or percent
reactivity) and how you will compare them (statistical analyses, if
appropriate). You must specify what
differences you will consider significant; e.g., p < 0.05, a shift in band
location on a gel, a 2-fold decrease in optical density. The reproducibility of data must be
assessed. You will propose a format
for presentation of data; i.e., how the final figures or tables might
look. (NOTE STANDARD FORMAT FOR FIGURES
AND TABLES. Tables: titles on top,
footnotes for additional information.
Figures: title below with legend for additional information in complete
sentences.) Lastly, you must speculate about the anticipated results and how they
may correlate with your hypothesis.
IV. Additional sections:
A.
Cover page: Include contact
information and committee. See
example.
B. Time line: Include a proposed, and hopefully realistic, time period for completion of each of the major parts of the research and writing. This should take into account things such as availability of clinical samples, acquiring necessary experimental expertise, real time to perform assays, etc.
C. Units: Total number and distribution of units requested for this research.
D.
References: All references cited
in the text must be included in the Reference section and all references in the
Reference section must be cited in the text.
Use the New England Journal of Medicine format with two
exceptions: include all authors’ names
and you need not superscript the citations.
****EXAMPLES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE CBLS OFFICE****